The Qur'ān says, “Indeed, God enjoins justice and kindness.” (16:90) Given that the context of this verse pertains to the responsibilities of human beings toward their society, the term ‘justice’ should be interpreted as ‘social justice’. Thus, God has ordered human beings to uphold justice.
'Allāma Ṭabāṭabā'ī has said that social justice denotes treating each member of society in accordance with their merit and ensuring everyone receives their rights. This social quality is an obligation that responsible individuals must observe [1]
The establishment of social justice is one of the most important teachings of divine prophets ('a). Hence they strived to explain its essence and scientific principles, inculcate its spirit within humanity, and compel its acceptance as a cornerstone upon which earthly life depends. Anyone with basic knowledge of religious teachings understands that the establishment of social justice enlivens God's religion.
Thus, until justice prevails, true religion remains incomplete. Similarly, until universal social justice takes root, the fulfillment of religious and legal obligations remain unattained. [2]
The absence of social justice historically has been the cause of most revolutions. Noble-minded reformers have consistently started their movements with the of establishing social justice and eradicating discrimination. The Prophet (ṣ) said that “Justice in social struggle is like a guardian shield which protects people from oppression; and it is like a stable paradise that perpetually bestows its blessings” [3]
Although it is necessary for everyone to respect one another's rights, it is more important for a leader [to respect human rights]. In this regard, Imām 'Alī ('a) told his commanders that neglecting people's rights equates to ruin [4]. Additional, Imām Riḍā ('a) said that the Household (Ahl al-Bayt) of the Prophet (ṣ) are guardians and protectors of the believers' rights [5]
However, it is not solely leaders who must foster social justice; Islām has said both leaders and followers possess rights. Social justice can only thrive when everyone's rights are upheld. Imām 'Alī ('a) said that mutual respect between leaders and followers results in the elevation of righteousness, the revelation of religious principles, and the solidification of just characteristics.[6]
One of the most important characteristics of social justice is meritocracy, which means entailing the assignment of roles and responsibility based on individual merit. Justice mandates that the most qualified individuals are given precedence for opportunities and higher positions.
Imām 'Alī ('a) instructed Mālik Ashtar to appoint individuals to different positions in accordance with their merit (Nahj al-Balāgha, letter to Malik Ashtar). The Prophet (s) emphasized that it is treachery to appoint less qualified people to positions of authority [7]
Another characteristic of social justice is paying attention to the rights of the poor and needy. Injustice is a contributing factor to poverty, which in turn breeds various hardships. Luqman said that of all the bitterness he had encountered, poverty was the harshest. The Prophet (s) said that poverty, pain, enmity, and fire are never trivial [8], and that poverty represents a significant form of death [9]
These reports show that leaders have heavy responsibilities, because the poor need justice more than other people.
When oppression becomes prevalent in society, leaders should not merely distance themselves from it; they ought to stand up and fight for the rights of the oppressed. In fact, all individuals must resist remaining silent when others endure oppression, as passivity equates to complicity in oppression.
Furthermore, not only oppression destroys everything, including culture, economics, wisdom, ability, talent, innovation, etc. but also it is the biggest obstacle to establish justice within society. Imam 'Alī ('a) asserted that ending oppression is a prerequisite for justice.
It has been reported that one day a rich man and a poor man were sitting next to each other. The rich man pulled his face at the poor man and adjusting his clothes. Observing this the Prophet (ṣ) asked the rich man “Are you afraid that some of his poverty will be transmitted to you?” [10]
The Prophet (s), both in words and acts, paid attention to this important characteristic. For example, when a woman from the Banī Makhzūm tribe committed theft and the people asked the Prophet (s) to judge, her family, who were still influenced by the customs of the class system, considered execution of punishment to be shameful for their aristocratic family. As a result, they started looking for ways to prevent the punishment. To this end, they coerced Usama ibn Zayd, whom the Prophet (s) held in deep affection, to intercede with the Prophet (s) and halt the punishment. However, scarcely had Usama begun to speak when the Prophet (s) grew angry and said no one should stop him from implementing God's laws. Usama promptly sought forgiveness. Later that day, the Prophet (s), aiming to dispel any perception of favoritism, addressed the incident in a speech. He said “Throughout history, tribes and nations declined and vanished due to favoritism in justice’s administration. When both an aristocrat and a commoner committed the same crime, they would punish the commoner while granting impunity to the aristocrat. I swear by the God in whose hands hold my life that I shall spare no one from punishment, regardless of their social standing, whether high or low” [11]
On a different occasion, when Umm Hānī, Imām Alī's sister, went to see him, the Imam gave her twenty dirhams. When she asked her non-Arab bondswoman about her received amount, the female slave said she had also been given twenty dirhams. Incensed by this equality, Umm Hānī confronted her brother, Imam Ali, in protest. In response, the Imam sent her back with these words: “Go back, and may God forgive you. In the Book of God, we have not found any preference for Ishmael over Isaac” [12]
A leader must avoid treating benevolent and malevolent individuals equally, as this engenders injustice. Imām Alī ('a) instructed Mālik Ashtar to avoid treating benevolent and malevolent individuals equally, because doing so could discourage the benevolent and embolden the malevolent. Instead, everyone should be rewarded according to their deeds.[13]
references
- (Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur'ān, vol. 24, pp. 243-246).
- (Al-Ḥayāt, vol. 2, p. 97).
- (al-Ḥadīth – Riwayāt-e Tarbiyyatī, vol. 2, p. 265).
- (Nahj al-Balāgha, letter no. 79)
- (Musnad al-Imām al-Riḍā, ('a), vol. 1, p. 136).
- (Nahj al-Balāgha, sermon no. 216).
- (Al-Ta'ajub, p. 59).
- (Nahj al-Faṣāha, saying no. 252)
- (Nahj al-Balāgha, saying no. 163).
- (Majmu'at Waram, vol. 1, p. 214).
- (Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhārī, vol. 5, p. 152).
- (Biḥār al-Anwār, vol. 40, p. 106).
- (Nahj al-Balāgha, letter no. 53).
It takes courage to live in this world. Because if you are alive, then you need to take action. And for taking a decisive step, you need to be courageous. The courage to stand up for an oppressed person, the courage to stand up against discrimination, the courage to stop violence against animals, the courage to preserve the earth, or even the courage to listen to the news of genocide and wish to have the strength to do something for it.
But many of us do not take action. Or do not even care. We may be afraid or may wait for someone else to do something. Say a superman or someone beyond us.
Many philosophers from Plato and Aristotle to modern thinkers regard courage as one of the most vital human virtues. For Plato, courage is “what allows reason to rule, both in the individual and in society.” Aristotle also believes that courage is not just about taking risks but thinking wisely in the face of danger [1]. Taking risks is courageous, but knowing why you are risking is even more critical.
Islam, also, values the attribute of courage highly [i]. In Islam courage is the result of many other virtues. Even more, the reason behind your courageous deed is of more importance than having courage in itself. In other words, you are courageous if you are taking action for the right cause. That is, what you have found belief in after in-depth and rational investigation [ii], and do not forget to be moral along the way.
Imam Hussain (AS) Was Courageous in the true Sense of the Word Because He…
Imam Hussain (AS), saw the injustice that was imposed upon the society of his time and realized how what the rulers called Islam was far from the true teachings of Islam. Oppression, tyranny, unjust use of public property, etc. made life miserable for people.
So, instead of remaining silent and doing nothing, he decided to improve the society. He practiced courage in standing up against what was wrong, and in accepting the dangers of his decision.
Surrendering to and accepting the injustice and oppression, is considered a huge sin in Islam for someone who is capable of standing up against it and can improve the situation. That is one of the reasons why enjoining the right and forbidding the wrong (Amr bi-l-maʿruf and Nahy ʿani-l-munkar) are among the practical principles of Islam; to improve the society and bring awareness to people.
Imam Hussain (AS) was courageous and stood up against what was wrong. But he never gave up his human virtues for the sake of furthering his purpose. In other words, for Imam Hussain (AS), “the end does not justify the means.” While his enemy was impatient to start the war, he did his best to prevent it by negotiating and bringing awareness to them [1].
He was not afraid of fighting, yet, for him starting a war with the enemy was not the end. Instead, leading them to what is right, toward a life of honor and dignity rather than humiliation and oppression, was his ultimate purpose. Imam Hussain (AS), tried to show that being just is far more important than being courageous. If everyone is just, then no right would be taken away, and you do not need to be courageous to stand up against it [iii].
According to Imam Ali (AS), courage is dependent upon three virtues which complement each other. These are self-sacrifice, not bowing down to humiliation and oppression and not being after making a name for yourself [2]. In his movement, Imam Hussain (AS) exhibited all these virtues. He sacrificed his life and family, did not surrender to the injustice his enemies were imposing, and never cared about his fame but was entirely devoted to Allah’s cause [iv].
In Islam, the intention always comes before the action. Imam Hussain (AS) knew well why he was taking action. For him, nothing was more important than Allah’s satisfaction and reviving the true teachings and peaceful message of Islam in the corrupt society of his time [v].
He was courageous for the right cause. Neither was he after usurping the throne, nor manipulating people for his own sake. In that case, he would not be courageous anymore but selfish. As Charles Dickens admitted, “If Husain (as) had fought to quench his worldly desires…then I do not understand why his sister, wife, and children accompanied him. It stands to reason, therefore, that he sacrificed purely for Islam” [6].
Imam Hussain (AS) did take a risk in furthering his purpose, but he never acted unwisely and on his whim. When people sent thousands of letters from Kufa to Imam Hussain (AS), to ask for his help and declare their devotion to him, he did not accept their invitation immediately.
Instead, he first sent a representative to their city to validate their claim. Also, on the day of Ashura, despite his enemy's insistence on war, and while he was not afraid of fighting with them, he first tried to reason with them. You cannot be called courageous if you let go of your insight and wisdom and act recklessly [vi].
As said earlier, Imam Hussain (AS) was not willing to go to war with his enemy. While he was fully capable of fighting with them, and he courageously did it with only 72 people against thousands, he was never in favor of making war without any good reason. He was a courageous leader and guide, not a ruthless tyrant.
Thus, he first tried to guide his enemy toward the true teachings of Islam through speaking and reasoning, but when he saw their insistence on being ignorant, he was forced into a war.
It takes courage and spiritual strength to endure the pain of losing your beloved ones. Imam Hussain (AS) lost many of his family members and friends in the battle of Karbala, including his brother and two of his sons. However, while he felt a deep pain in his heart, he never lost his control and power of reason.
And he never regretted his action, nor doubted his cause. He was sure that what he did was for the sake of Allah’s satisfaction and his movement will forever inspire those who are seeking what is right.
Notes:
[i] Imam Ali (AS) said, “Generosity and courage are great attributes that Allah bestows upon whoever He loves most and has examined before”[7]
[ii] “In Islam, faith is nothing beyond human’s reason and understanding; in other words, the axioms of this religion are the fundamental principles that are rational by themselves and can be ascertained by people’s common sense. So stepping onto the stage of this faith depends on the submission that is gained through preliminary investigation of its axioms” [5].
[iii] Imam Ali (AS) said, “ Justice is better than courage. Since if every person is just toward other people, then they won’t need to be courageous” [9]
[iv] On the cause of his movement, Imam Hussain (AS) said,“O' God! Surely you know that whatever we did was not a competition to gain worldly positions and not for the worthless physical attractions of the world. But to show the signs of religious ways and to remove corruption from your lands, so that the oppressed feel secured and act according to your traditions and rules.” [3]
[v] Imam Hussain (AS) said, “My revolution aims to reform the society and revive the true teachings of Islam.” [4]
[vi] Imam Ali (AS) said, “ negligence and not having foresight, spoils the courage” [8].
References:
- al-Shaykh al-Mufid, al-Irshad, p.253.
- Ibn Shu'ba al-Harrani, Tuhaf al-'uqul, p.322.
- Ibid. p.239.
- Ibid. p.243.
- The Islamic Axioms
- HUssain (AS)
- Abd al-Wāhid b. Muḥammad al-Āmidī, Ghurar al-hikam wa durar al-kalim, p.375.
- Ali ibn Muhammad Laithi Vaseti, Oyun al-Hikmah va al-Mavaez, p. 182.
- Ibn Abi al-Hadid, The interpretation of Nahj al-Balaghah, vol 20, p.333.
Discussing the issue of music in Islam sounds a bit controversial. If we suppose that music is food for the soul, we cannot easily say if it is allowed (Halal) or not. Unlike the issue of meat in Islam that is precisely explained in the Holy Quran, the issue of music has never been mentioned in the Quran. However, we cannot say that because God has not directly spoken about music, therefore it is allowed (Halal) or forbidden (Haram). Because music is something that does exist in this world and God has not left us without guidance in such matters.
Since there is no explicit information about music in the Quran, people keep questioning if the music is allowed in Islam or not.
Therefore, the goal of this article is to explain the characteristics of lawful (Halal) and forbidden (Haram) music in Islam, based on the rulings from jurists.
In the description of the music, it is said that “Music is the technique of mixing sounds and voices in a pleasant way that makes the listener enjoy as well as making an internal revolution for his/her soul” [1].
To distinguish between lawful (Halal) and forbidden (Haram) music, it is easier to find out what forbidden (Haram) music is. Then any kind of music that does not include the characteristics of forbidden (Haram) music is lawful (Halal).
Before explaining forbidden (Haram) music, it is useful to get familiar with a few related phrases:
Mutrib music: a sort of music that causes impulsive movement for the listener.
Lahwi music: a sort of music that is common or suitable for frivolous gatherings and carouses.
Apart from these descriptions, and to provide a better conceptual understanding for the phrases above, we could say that mutrib or lahwi music is that which due to its characteristics keeps human beings away from Allah, and away from moral merits and drives them towards sinful acts and carelessness.
The forbidden (Haram) type of music is suitable for dissolute gatherings of sin. Any music which is lahwi and mutrib in the common view is forbidden (Haram). Distinguishing the subject of this ruling depends on the view of each religiously responsible individual (mukallaf ), and there is no objection to listening to a song if it is distinguished as Halal; keeping in mind that the personality of the musician, the vocalized words accompanying the music, the venue, and all other circumstances may contribute to placing it in the category of forbidden (Haram), lahwi, mutrib music, or another forbidden (Haram) category; e.g., if the music, due to the mentioned things, leads to certain corruptions [2].
We Should Recognize Which Music Is Forbidden (Haram) for Us
In the controversial case of music, it is up to the Muslim person to realize if the music he/ she is listening to is forbidden (Haram) or not.
When we want to listen to a song we should see:
If it is mutrib music (immaterial)
If it is lahwi music and suitable for carouses (Irrespective of whether it contains the element of excitement or engenders in the listener a state of melancholy and crying.)
If it contains ghina in its singing
If it contains vain and useless concepts that create distance between God and us.
For example, the musician may disagree with the listener’s point of view. In this case, what the Muslim person regards as lahwi and suitable for gatherings of sin is forbidden (Haram) for him to listen to. As for the sounds which fall in a grey area, the ruling in their regard is that it is permissible to listen to them [3].
Any music that does not include the above characteristics is lawful (Halal), and there is no objection to listening to such music in Islam.
There is no objection in using musical instruments to play non-lahwi tunes if it is for revolutionary or religious chanting or carrying out useful cultural and other programs aiming at rational and lawful (Halal) purposes, provided that it results in no bad consequences.
At the same time, using musical instruments to play lahwi and /or mutrib tunes is not permissible [4].
Learning and teaching music for the above-mentioned causes are allowed (If it is for revolutionary or religious chanting or carrying out useful cultural and other programs aiming at rational and lawful (Halal) purposes).
Musical instruments which, according to the common view, are of dual - lawful (Halal) and forbidden (Haram) - purposes can be used in a non-lahwi manner for lawful (Halal) purposes. Instruments, which the common view regards as special to the production of lahwi music, are not permissible to use [5].
Also, in itself, there is no problem in teaching and learning music for the purposes mentioned above [6].
There is no problem in buying and selling musical instruments that serve dual purposes [i], intending to use them in playing non-lahwi tunes.
Accordingly, it is not permissible to buy, sell, or distribute CDs that contain mutrib and/ or lahwi music that is suitable for gatherings of carouse, regardless of the language it is composed in or the country of origin [7].
There is no harm in the use of musical instruments to play tunes for revolutionary chanting, national anthems, or any other lawful (Halal) and useful pursuit provided that it does not entail rapture and frivolity suitable for the gatherings of carouse and falsehood.
But with regards to singing with music, the musician should make sure that the music will not be accompanied by ghina [8].
Therefore, any type of music that is branded for gatherings of carouse is forbidden (Haram), even if it does not arouse sexual temptation. As a result, any kind of music that is not common for such gatherings is lawful (Halal), such as martial music.
Making these types of lawful (Halal) music for the use of Muslims and for the improvement of the community, or for spreading good values is lawful (Halal).
Overall, any kind of music that creates a distance between the soul and God is forbidden (Haram).
Notes:
[i] Musical instruments are divided into two groups; 1- specific instruments, 2- dual-purpose instruments. The first group is those instruments that are known to be specifically used in carouse gatherings, while dual-purpose instruments are those which can be used for both lawful (Halal) and forbidden (Haram) purposes. Most jurists have named a few instruments as dual-purpose instruments such as a chime, drum, piano, dulcimer, etc. but in the case of specific instruments, they have not named any and have left the recognition to the Muslim person [9].
References:
- Rouhollah Khaleghi, An overview on music, p.4
- http://www.leader.ir/en/book/23?sn=5708
- ibid
- ibid
- ibid
- ibid
- ibid
- ibid
- music in Islam